Very interesting, coincidental follow-up to the previous post:

Apparently the comparison of James Dean and Marilyn Monroe isn't too uncommon. In the preface to a book I checked out for class, titled Forever England; The Life of Rupert Brooke, by Mike Read, it says, "James Dean made a handful of films, where others have made dozens, yet he remains the cult figure of films. Marilyn Monroe could never be considered a great actress [Jon's note; she was coming around towards the end], yet her name is still on everyone's lips over 30 years after her death."

I think this was in the preface because Rupert Brooke died quite young, and the author of the biography goes on to compare him to other people in music and such. I just think it's pretty interesting that I should find this book the day after I make a post like the previous one, even though our comparisons are for very different reasons--his being to put context on a biography of a moderately well-known poet, and mine being to unbiasedly show why James Dean is overrated. Obviously my insight is much more important.

Continue reading...

I know I'm going to get shit for saying this, but here it goes: James Dean is terrible.

Okay, that was a mild exaggeration, but he's far from the iconic, amazing actor that some people think of him as. I will admit, having two Academy Award nominations by the time you're 24 is pretty amazing, but both of his performances were mediocore at best. Here's a quote I like, from IMDb.

Director Elia Kazan did not believe that Dean would have been able to sustain the momentum of his career. He felt that Dean's career, had he lived, would have sputtered out, as he was not well-trained and relied too much on his instincts, as opposed to his idol Marlon Brando, who, contrary to what people believed, had been very well-trained by his acting teacher Stella Adler and relied on that training to create his characters.

It's pretty well-known that Dean idolized Brando (any aspiring actor should, since Marlon Brando is pretty much the best actor ever), and also pretty well-known that he would just do his thing, and not rely on actual talent or direction. Dean had a very momentary, free-flowing style of acting. Dean also had a really screwed up personal life (which I won't go into details about, just wikipedia it), which naturally makes it tought to maintain a professional career. But real-life details aside, my whole point is this: You can't base someone's status as a 'legend' on three performances, and think that if they had lived, they would've been the best thing ever. It's been amazingly good for his career that he died how he did.

Now, let's compare this to Marilyn Monroe (this is a loose comparison, but bear with me [plus I love Marilyn Monroe, but this is unbiased, I assure you]). Marilyn Monroe died when she was 36, and I think a lot of her appeal would be gone had she lived a normal lifespan (let's say she lived to be 70), because she would've taken roles as an older woman, and not been so much the sex symbol she was. The fact that she died so young stuck her in history as a permanent super-star and cultural icon, much like James Dean; however, Marilyn Monroe made about twenty movies, and as her career progressed, she became more involved, eventually owning her own production company, taking acting lessons, and by the end, other than her notorious unreliability (sickness, missing work, etc.), she was growing immensely as an actress, and genuinely wanted to improve her life.

James Dean was not--he was too busy making freakish phone calls to Marlon Brando in the early morning hours, had already reached a career high point (he didn't win any Oscars [and rightfully so]), and the only place for him to go was down.

If you're someone looking for an idol, or just looking for a great actor who has a good career that spanned more than two decent movies, don't be lazy--watch the works of any number of other legendary actors: Marlon Brando, William Holden, Cary Grant, Humphrey Bogart, Spencer Tracey, James Stewart, Clark Gable, Gregory Peck... that's a short list, and only males. There's also plenty of females, probably even more than the guys.

Alright, end of rant.

Continue reading...

I really hate Paris Hilton. There's numerous reasons for this, but one of the most lingering is how full of herself she is. Here's an example:

“I think every decade has an iconic blonde — like Marilyn Monroe or Princess Diana — and right now, I’m that icon.” Link

You've got to be kidding me. Marilyn Monroe worked her way up to stardom. Marilyn Monroe was sexy. Marilyn Monroe was an icon, could actually act (towards the end of her career), and was an innovator (with her image). Paris Hilton is a narcissistic bitch who was born with $34987539846379679 and the only thing she does is go around promoting herself.

It's tragic that both Marilyn and Princess Di had their lives ended before their time was up - and maybe I'll go to Hell for saying this - but hopefully Paris follows them sometime soon, in one way or another.

Continue reading...

Very quick mini-reviews:

Cabaret (1972) - IMDb

I like a good musical, but for some reason Cabaret didn't do it for me. The songs were entertaining, the acting was pretty good, the movie paid attention to details and was very pretty, but the fact I had to look at Liza Minelli for 2 hours was a huge turn-off.

She played a great Sally Bowles and I was laughing at some of her lines, but she looks like a 12 year-old boy and it's hard to buy into her being somewhat of a prostitute.

This movie was good in visuals and good on paper, but the feel and mood just wasn't doing it for me.

Rating: 7/10

How to Marry a Millionaire (1953) - IMDb

A feel-good comedy about three girls who move to New York and rent out a high class apartment in hopes of marrying millionaires, until unfortunately (or, fortunately, depending on how you look at it) they find that money and love don't always mix.

Highly predictable plot, but still enjoyable because of some good one-liners and nice eye candy. Even though she's on the posters and DVDs, Marilyn Monroe isn't really the star of this picture, she just has some cute jokes about how she's damn near blind without her glasses (most of which seem commonplace now, but back then were original).

It's all build-up until the last scene where all the ladies have all the men, and though it's expected from about ten minutes in, it's a very satisfying ending.

Rating: 7/10

North by Northwest (1959) - IMDb

Alfred Hitchcock. Cary Grant. Eva Marie Saint (hint: On the Waterfront).

Amazing script. About 10-15 minutes too long for my tastes, but maybe that's because I was watching it when I was tired. Who's to question Hitchcock anyway? What a genius.

See this movie.

Rating: 9.25/10

Continue reading...

Some Like It Hot IMDb

AFI voted it the #1 comedy of all time... I don't know about that, but there are many laughs to be had while watching this classic. Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis do outstanding jobs as the cross-dressing band members, and the scenes with Curtis playing 'Junior' are some of the funniest I have ever witnessed. I'm talking 'Peter Sellers as Jacques Clouseau in "A Shot in the Dark" and "The Pink Panther"' funny. Definitely the highlights of this movie.

Aside from those two, Marilyn Monroe, as expected, is gorgeous - playing the 'not very bright' girl perfectly (probably because it's true?).

Ok, I'm short on time. I might edit this later with more (but probably not). But seriously, if you can find a copy (I now have one, so yay), see this movie.

Rating: 9/10

Edit 9/2/08: 9/10? What was I thinking? This movie is a definite 10/10, and one of the few films that no matter how I feel, I know will always cheer me up.

Continue reading...